Skip to content
September 28, 2012 / missmarymax

Why “Weight Stigma Awareness Week” Makes Me Nervous

Weight Stigma Awareness Week

It’s Weight Stigma Awareness Week.

The campaign, brought to us by the Binge Eating Disorder Association seeks “to bring awareness to a common and entrenched social injustice that often results in serious physical and mental health consequences.”

Many people I know are participating in WSAW, on- or off-line. In general, those people are highly involved in the Fat Acceptance and/ or the Eating Disorder Recovery communities, both of which I consider vital movements.  They believe, as I do, in putting forward fat acceptance and recovery messages whenever we’re able to do so. I’m grateful to them for seizing this week as a vehicle to do additional advocacy.  I’m also grateful to the new audiences, opening themselves to our messages, perhaps for the first time.

Still.

I’m uncomfortable with WSAW. I recognize the good that’s taking place under its name, and I’m grateful for it  – but I remain uncomfortable. After all, good occurs during Fat Talk Free Week, the Tri-Delta-sponsored event to eliminate body snark. That doesn’t make the campaign a pure, unadulterated Force o’ Good. People take intense comfort in Susan G. Komen’s Race for the Cure. That doesn’t change the fact that the Komen foundation has some s’plainin’ to do.

And this, ultimately, is my understanding of WSAW as well: There is good happening under this heading. And still, the heading feels dangerous.

At the core of my discomfort is this question: What is “weight stigma”? Is it synonymous with “fat stigma”? Is it the oppression fat people experience at the interpersonal (“should you be eating that?”) and systemic (“war on obesity!”) levels?

…Partially.  Fat acceptance is certainly one platform that ends up speaking through the microphone of this awareness week. Unfortunately, it’s not the only one. It’s not the only one because — by shifting from “fat” to “weight” — we open the door to those who put “skinnybashing” under the weight stigma heading. In doing so, we usher in a veritable Equivocation-fest, in which it doesn’t matter if you’re too fat or too thin, you’re put through the wringer based on your body, and no one deserves that.

Let me be clear here.

No one deserves that.

No one deserves to be shamed, hated, or discriminated against based on their body.

And still, regardless — skinnybashing is not on par with fat oppression.

The fact that skinnybashing is not on par with fat oppression does not mean it hurts less. The pain skinnybashing causes individual people does not hurt less (or matter less) than the pain caused by fatphobia. But it does occur in a different context, and it has not been institutionalized to the extent that fat oppression has. And no matter how genuinely pained thin people are — and no matter how much we should be doing about that – terms like “weight stigma” and “body diversity” erase the power dynamics between body types. They suggest we are all harmed equally. They erase the prevalence of fat oppression, specifically.

The fact that thin-shaming is not about thin oppression does not mean it’s not worth addressing. It means that, if we’re to address it effectively, we must consider its true causes.

For starters: saneism (the privileging of those without mental illnesses).  Many claims of “skinnybashing” are linked to the presumption that the thin person has anorexia. When thin people are presumed anorexic and told to “eat a sandwich” – they are not the target of a social, anti-thin agenda. They’re the target of stigma toward mentally ill people in general, and toward people with EDs, specifically. The vitriol spewed at people with eating disorders would likely astound anyone without one. Everything from death threats in the inbox (interpersonal) to the refusal of medical coverage (systemic). These are awful realities.  But convincing people that we can be thin and healthy, thin and sexy, or thin and beautiful won’t change them.

How can I be sure of that?

Because people are already convinced of those things.

…Because every public representation of a “healthy” body is thin – even if you have been told, as a thin person, that you look sick. Because “sex appeal” is consistently portrayed as thinner than the average person, even when it’s portrayed as “curvy.” Becausediscussions of anorexia are consistently linked to discussions of the beauty ideal, — because we take it for granted that the struggle to be thinner is, automatically, the struggle to be beautiful. And we do this because we equate thinness with beauty.

If skinnybashing is – in part — about cultural attitudes toward anorexia, the solution is minimizing stigma toward those with eating disorders, not those with a low BMI. (Conflating the two only further solidifies the notion that thin people — only and always — have EDs.) The solution is minimizing stigma and  increasing awareness about what anorexia really means. About the fact that it can occur, can be occurring, can even be severe in any body type. About the reality of anorexia as an illness, the difficulty of finding and affording quality treatment, the ongoing confusion about what causes this disease and what should be pursued as a cure.

It’s no secret that body-policing is rampant in our culture. But if we want to put an end to that, we must do so for those who experience it most consistently. We do not dismantle racism by defending my right not to be called “cracker.” We do not dismantle sexism by defending men’s right not to be presumed rapists. And we will not end sizeism by defending the beauty and health of thin bodies.

We must neutralize the fat body.

It is entirely possible to have an eating disorder and to be fat. But having an eating disorder is not in itself a pass to ignore fat oppression. Nor is being fat a pass to understand or berate those with eating disorders. I fully believe in these two movements working together. But are they doing so here, in a way that recognizes the power dynamics?

And if not, how can we change that?

Advertisements

2 Comments

Leave a Comment
  1. Jackie Rose / Nov 30 2013 2:00 pm

    I agree completely with what you said. I was banned from a fat acceptance blog for suggesting this, because they believe activism only matters if it benefits everyone, regardless that it brings a false equivalency of issues in terms of discrimination. I then posted a link to a cyberbully who bullied me off Tumblr for not agreeing that skinnybashing was at the same level of discrimination of fat prejudice. They claimed my cyberbully was right about me, that their holding my past against me from when I was a teenager on the net was deserved. This is what skinnybashing advocates seek to achieve by their claims they are equally discriminated against as fat people. To silence fat acceptance, by claiming fat people are oppressors too. Very much like the example you gave regarding white people claiming the term “cracker” is also racist.

    I was extremely upset for having been betrayed by someone who should’ve been considering fat people first, I later realized they just weren’t strong enough to take that stand. That they felt playing oppression olympics and trying to please everyone was how activism worked. This is what advocates of skinnybashing claims try to cause to happen.

    If you don’t believe that being too fat is just as bad as being too thin, then you’re a bully who deserves to have your past dug up, they even attempted to post an image of me they got from another site, fortunately I had enough tech understanding to get it taken down via the source, and Tumblr while they permitted my cyberbully to continue hurting me, took the picture down for fear of having a lawyer called on them. I have been afraid to post an image of myself on the internet since. You deserve to be told you’re no better than the people who oppressed you, all so you will be silenced.

    I have no idea why fat acceptance people would stand for this. It’s not just this person, people who have created their lives around their thin privilege will abuse the heck out of fat people for not seeing themselves as lesser. Recently Maria Kang posted a rant on the Facebook page of fat women modeling lingerie, and upset many fat acceptance advocates. This is why some fat people act out against thin people. It never seems to end, their attack on fat people. Not all thin people do this, but those that do not only hurt fat people, but make it harder for thin people who are associated with people like Maria Kang who act as if fat people don’t deserve to live. They are contributing to skinnybashing, when they go after fat people.

    I am so tired of all the drama over the claiming that thin shaming and fat shaming are equal issues. It only causes everyone pain, and for what? So some attention needy fit people can brag about their accomplishments without being told to keep it to themselves?

Trackbacks

  1. Body Image, BMI, and the Continuing Problem of the Standards of Beauty | IJFAB Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: